any idea as to what will happen to them or when they will be released
or removed. They have been held for varying periods of time; the
longest being six months. They are demanding that they all be released
and granted asylum, but would rather they were removed (to a safe
place) than held arbitrarily with no time limit. They have also
complained of their treatment inside the centre, saying that they came
here asking for refuge, and instead have been locked up and badly
treated. One man who was on hunger strike has already been released.
They come from all three regions of Darfur and include members of the
Zaghawa, Tama, Mirra, Berti, and Tunjur tribes. At least one of the
hunger strikers is a confirmed torture survivor with visible wounds,
who is well-known in his home town of Nyala and whose name is
instantly recognisable to many Sudanese in the UK. Torture survivors
are not supposed to be held in immigration detention under UK law, but
campaigning groups say that this law is regularly flouted by the UK
Border Agency.
The hunger strikers requested visits and various supporters from
Oxford independently organised visits for the evening of 30 May.
Despite pre-arranging visits each of the visitors was turned away on
different spurious reasons (some with no reason given) once detention
centre management realised they were visiting Sudanese men. (Two other
regular visitors who were not visiting any of the hunger strikers but
who happened to arrive at a similar time were also turned away with no
reasons given.)
The first visitors, Nazar Eltahir (Chair of the Sudanese community in Oxford) and Tim Flatman (a human rights activist who regularly travels to Sudan/South Sudan and supports Sudanese and South Sudanese migrants in the UK) were told that the person they were visiting had told staff they were not expecting a visitor and had not heard of them. They asked staff to check again with him and after supposedly doing so the same statement was repeated. Staff said they had spoken to him through a translation service.
On leaving the detention centre and phoning the man they were due to visit, he told them that he was expecting the visit and no staff from the detention centre had spoken to him or asked him whether he was expecting a visit or not. Other visitors were told that they had not pre-booked despite their names being clearly visible on the pre-booked list lying on the reception desk.
Supporters have vowed to try and visit the hunger strikers again to
support them and intend to submit a complaint alleging that detention
centre management attempted to cover up the hunger strike and
illegally refused and lied to visitors to the company who manage
Campsfield (Mitie), to the Independent Monitoring Board, to the HM
Chief Inspector of Prisons and to the Minister for Immigration
tomorrow (31 May) through their local MP. A demonstration in support
of the hunger strikers for Friday 1 June at 6pm in Carfax, Oxford, has
also been called by the local Sudanese community and various
campaigning and human rights organisations. All are welcome.