HOME | IMC UK | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

Oxford Indymedia

Save Our NHS, Public Meeting, Stroud 15 March 2012

@StroudAnticuts | 09.03.2012 10:19 | Health | Public sector cuts | Social Struggles | Birmingham | Oxford

Following a high court challenge by Stroud resident Michael Lloyd, NHS Gloucestershire has withdrawn plans to transfer our local hospitals & 3000 NHS health workers out of the NHS. This is great news, but this is just the first step in keeping our health services in the NHS. The campaign to Keep Gloucestershire’s NHS Public needs your support now more than ever.

SAVE OUR NHS - NO TO PRIVATISATION - KEEP GLOUCESTERSHIRE’S NHS PUBLIC

Thursday March 15th
Subscription Rooms, Stroud
Doors and bar from 7pm
Meeting prompt start at 7.30pm
Bookings and Enquiries: 01453 760900.
Tickets are free but please book as we expect a high turnout

Following a high court challenge by Stroud resident Michael Lloyd, NHS Gloucestershire has withdrawn plans to transfer our local hospitals & 3000 NHS health workers out of the NHS.

They agreed to go back to the drawing board, to consult the local community and health
workers about what they want, and to seek NHS options, which do not require a
competitive tendering process.

This is great news, but this is just the first step in keeping our health services in the NHS. The campaign to Keep Gloucestershire’s NHS Public needs your support now more than ever.

Come to a Public Meeting to celebrate Michael Lloyd’s recent
success in the High Court and fi nd out:
• What does the outcome of the legal case mean for the
plans to transfer services out of the NHS?
• What will happen next?
• What are the options for the services staying in the NHS,
and how can we ensure they are properly pursued?
• How does the Health & Social Care Bill affect us locally?
• How can you help the campaign to Keep Our NHS Public?

Stroud Against the Cuts: www.stroudagainstcuts.co.uk
 contact@stroudagainstcuts.co.uk

Cheltenham Against Cuts & Gloucester Against Cuts:
 cheltenhamagainstcuts@gmail.com
cheltenhamagainstcuts.wordpress.com

Forest Against Cuts:  http://www.facebook.com/pages/Save-Your-Local-Hospitals-the-Dilke-and-Lydney/158954294152740

@StroudAnticuts
- e-mail: contact@stroudagainstcuts.co.uk
- Homepage: www.stroudagainstcuts.co.uk

Comments

Hide the following comment

Briefing explaining local situation + how you can help

09.03.2012 10:50

How you can help Keep Gloucestershire’s NHS Public
Stroud Against the Cuts Briefing 2 27/02/2012

Introduction: The positive outcome of the legal challenge against transferring our local hospitals and health services out of the NHS and into a ‘social enterprise’, has put the options to stay in the NHS back on the table. But this is only the first step in the campaign. We must now ensure the NHS options are properly pursued, so our health services stay in the NHS, publicly owned and accountable. This briefing:
• suggests ways you can help
• explains the outcome and implications of the high court legal challenge

Please get in touch if you would like to discuss these issues. We are particularly keen to talk to people who have contacts with health decision-makers or those who influence them, who would like to set up action groups in their areas, or who have ideas about how to help the campaign. To contact Stroud Against the Cuts (SATC) email:  contact@stroudagainstcuts.co.uk, or see our website www.stroudagainstcuts.co.uk for info. Thank you.

The court order: On February 9th 2012, following Michael Lloyd’s application for a Judicial Review in the High Court, NHS Gloucestershire (the PCT) agreed a legally binding ‘Consent Order’ which states:

“The PCT agrees that it will:
• consider a wide range of options, including entering into an arrangement with an NHS Trust for the delivery of [community health] services...
• advertise for expressions of interest for the provision of NHS services in Gloucestershire on www.supply2health.nhs.uk and in the Health Service Journal...
• take reasonable steps to ensure an appropriate level of staff & public engagement”
• And then “make a decision as to its preferred means of providing community healthcare services in Gloucestershire”
(The quotes here are selective purely because of limited space. The full court order is in ‘The Future of Gloucestershire’s NHS services’ briefing, available on our website.)

In a media statement jointly issued with Mr Lloyd (as part of the Court order) NHS Gloucestershire clarified that this means it has agreed:
• “not to implement its decision to enter into a contract with GCS[-CIC] at this time” (in other words, not to proceed with its plans to transfer all its clinical staff out of the NHS and into a ‘Community Interest Company’)
• To “start a new process to explore the best option for providing community services in Gloucestershire”, and to
• “minimise as far as possible uncertainty for its dedicated and professional staff”

To help keep Gloucestershire’s NHS public, we call on supporters to:
• Contact your local action group (or we can put you in touch or help you set one up)
• Write to, and seek meetings with, your elected representatives (for help and contacts see our website). Though NHS Gloucestershire are the decision-makers, Councillors and MPs have an important influencing role.
• Write to NHS Gloucestershire expressing your wishes. Postcards and contact details for this purpose are available from SATC.
• Help publicise the campaign with leaflets, posters, street stalls, and stickers, (available from SATC), by writing to local papers, and by donating money
• Attend public meetings (eg. Sub Rooms, Stroud, 7pm Thursday 15th March)
• Send public statements of support to  contact@stroudagainstcuts.co.uk or SATC, c/o The Exchange, Brick Row, Stroud, GL5 1DT. Sign the e-petition:  http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/keep-gloucestershire-s-nhs-public.html
• Join a union and get active within your branch (health worker or otherwise)
• Pass this briefing, or your own version, around any relevant groups you’re in (e.g. health organisations, unions, church groups, residents associations), and to your GP/health workers. Ask them to take the above actions suggested, either individually or as a group.

NHS options for Gloucestershire’s community health services and hospitals:
The court outcome demonstrated that options for retaining these services in the NHS:
• are better for patient care in terms of lower cost, greater accountability, protection for staff terms and conditions and healthcare expertise,
• were wrongly ruled out, in the face of strong opposition to the CIC from staff and a lack of public consultation, and
• are legally possible and could be pursued without the need for a full competitive tender which would open services up to the private sector.

NHS options include:
• The creation of a new standalone community health Trust for Gloucestershire
• Integration with the 2gether Trust (the county’s mental health services body)
• Integration with the local Acute Trust (Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham General and Gloucestershire Royal Hospitals)
• Integration with the Great Western Ambulance Service
• Integration with the South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust
• Integration with an NHS body from another county

Tendering: The court outcome demonstrated that all of the above NHS options could be pursued without the need for a full competitive tender process. Indeed, some services have already been transferred into local NHS Trusts (2gether and Acute). The only option discussed that would legally require a full competitive tender process, is transferring the services into a CIC (‘social enterprise’) which as well as opening the services to private sector competition, would be damaging to patient care and staff terms and conditions. If you hear anyone claim that the services now ‘have to go out to tender’, challenge this. Ask, ‘Do you accept that, so long as an NHS option comes forward, there is no need to have a formal competitive tender?’ As indicated above, the answer should be yes. If so, then follow up by asking what they are going to do to ensure NHS bodies come forward. If they answer no, ask them to state this in writing, detailing their reasons - and please pass this on to us!

Therefore, the campaign will be working to ensure that:
• NHS options listed above are fully and actively pursued
• The CIC (‘social enterprise’) route is not pursued
• And also that the whole service is contracted together, not fragmented into parts, which would damage patient care and risk opening up to the private sector.

We call on, and expect, the Board of NHS Gloucestershire to:
• ensure the people of Gloucestershire are given a clear choice to keep these services within the NHS,
• ensure the whole decision-making process is fair, transparent and democratic; involving campaigners, patients, the wider public, healthcare professionals, and negotiation with Trade Unions,
• vigorously pursue all of the NHS options listed above,
• make urgent approaches to the Department of Health to allow a standalone NHS trust to be allowed as an option, as it has been elsewhere,
• disclose any consideration of these options, both to date and in future, and
• base the criteria for decision-making on patient care and public opinion.

www.stroudagainstcuts.co.uk E:  contact@stroudagainstcuts.co.uk

SATC


Publish your news
-->

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Oxford Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech