Civil Liberties under attack - public meeting in Swindon

Thanks a lot you guys, just when we thought our future operations were going to be
hindered by Blunketts new laws you lot come along to support us. It's comforting to know that despite all we've done around the world, all the suicide bombers we've sent to their Virgins, all the innocents lost forever, all the lives ruined, we can still rely on people like you to make our lives (and operations) much easier.

Thanks again - - and if next time we get you or one of your loved ones you can be happy in the knowledge that you stuck to your principles.

You'd have to be pretty naive to trust the government only to use all these new laws and powers on terrorists.

These measures have very little impact on terrorists, but a huge impact on immigrants, protesters etc etc. How convenient.

Don't believe me? Check the history eg the last PTA (used against the republican movement, not the IRA) the anti-stalking laws (used against protesters now) etc etc

Even better ! Well done that's just the sort of stuff we need. Well done keep it up.

With help like that diverting people from the danger and making the government impotent to act against us we can keep killing.

Thanks again you are doing much for our cause.

I agree! Its great that people are debating laws and issues which could have an impact on reducing terrorism! Great stuff - its obvious that repression=increased chance of terrorism; its exactly why Saudi Arabia and many Arab states have Islamic Terrorists.

Well done Che, great bit of disinformation from you there as well. We draw strength from your support.

The bombs and bullets are coming, you will have helped make it possible

Hmmm. After reading the previous comments, one could easily draw the conclusion that a devil's advocate, with Conservative political opinion is attempting to suggust that:

(I) Opposing Blunkett's policies makes you a terrorist
(II)Opposing wars makes you a terrorist
(III)Opposing the war against Iraq helps terrorist

Perhaps we should begin in a lecture theatre or with a book, first we must define the word terrorist. Yes, I know - it would take time, and this discussion room is no place for it, except to point out that the victim of the killing will no longer have the ability to express their anger that (i) they were killed by an individual acting within an armed group, or their happiness (as Bush and Blair portray it) that (ii) they were killed by military forces acting on behalf of ?democratically? elected governments,

Now we have to define democratic - which, of course does not mean representative, but our herd to hooligan/football team-like system of electing networks of self-interested and corrupt people affiliated to political parties (which should probably be banned to ensure democracy). Thinking groups yes -> but we should elect individuals who can not organise their dishonesty in electable groups, so that all votes in Parliament are free votes, ie. no parties on ballot papers, and no electoral advertisement by groups, only individuals.

Lastly, we all know that this warring foreign policy and the atrocities committed by US/UK/ES are one of several root causes of attacks against US/UK/ES

When the bombs go off in London, I'll be blaming Blair - Smith - Blunkett.... so don't vote Labour, so don't vote Tory, so don't vote for turncoat LibDem -> vote Green -> and force them left by joining them!