HOME | IMC UK | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

Oxford Indymedia

Castle Mound out of Bounds - Imprisoned by Fencing

Ian Hodgson | 13.07.2003 13:47 | Free Spaces | Oxford

Oxford Castle Mound is no longer accessible to the public due to the recent erection of fencing around its base, in order to restrict access during the redevelopment of the castle and prison site.

Is this purely on the grounds of health and safety whilst archaeological and building work is carried out, or once the new complex of a hotel, restaurants and leisure facilities is completed, will public access to the mound be permanently restricted?

In a series of emailed questions to Richard Dudding, Director for Environment & Economy at Oxfordshire County Council, I attempted to ascertain whether the fencing was temporary or permanent, and whether, after the redevelopment of the site is complete, the public will have access to the top of the mound. I am yet to receive a reply, so if anyone else wants to try, his contact details are below.

The Oxfordshire County Council website states that, "The whole site and many of the buildings will be open to the public." But does "the whole site" include the mound? I also asked about whether the redevelopment includes provision for better access to what is an important historical and cultural landmark in the heart of Oxford.

The mound was used as a symbolic landmark in two recent local actions – the day of protest against war in Iraq in October 2002 and a similar protest by Oxford school students in March 2003.

Since the fencing was erected, a viewing platform has been installed on the north east side of the mound (access from a gate in New Road) This allows members of the public to see the archaeological dig which is continuing following the discovery of skeletons on the site, although after several viewing visits, I am yet to see much evidence of much happening.


Contact details for Richard Dudding - Director for Environment & Economy
Tel: 01865 815827 Fax: 01865 815085
e-mail:  richard.dudding@oxfordshire.gov.uk

Ian Hodgson
- e-mail: ianhodgson_@hotmail.com

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

Mound

15.07.2003 00:11

The mound has never previously been fenced off, and I never saw seen any signs informing the public that the mound was not 'open' to them, so it was reasonable to assume the mound was indeed 'open'. Certainly this was the view of everyone I know.

So if the public have always treated the mound as open, and the mound has not suffered any major 'damage', is it not reasonable to assume that the mound would continue to survive without being fenced off?

Tom
mail e-mail: tom@awesome.uk.com


Wider issues

23.07.2003 16:18

Thanks to everyone who has commented. I never disputed the fact that official access to the mound was by appointment, but rather meant access per se. Before the redevelopment commenced, it was very easy just to walk up the eastern side of the mound, and for the more athletic, up and over the New Road wall.

I think if people want to go up the mound (which they obviously did, but without the hassle of booking an appointment) the council should manage it properly and perhaps allow access whilst minimising damage, rather than simply restricting access completely.

In a wider context, I wanted to express my concern that the redevelopment of this quarter of the city risks being dominated by private development, with little regard for public amenity. The fencing around the mound seemed to be a step in this direction.

Ian Hodgson
mail e-mail: ianhodgson_@hotmail.com


castle mound

28.07.2003 21:53

walking thru someones garden is totally different from climbing the castle mound. someones garden is private property but the mound is public and everyone should be able to climb it who wants to.

claire


Keep pushing the issue Ian

04.08.2003 18:40

I fully support your approach to this open space issue, irrespective of the fine detail in the Oxford mound case. There are plenty of vested interests pushing for the profitisation of public spaces, and often these schemes do more damge than maintaining common access would(Cairgorm chairlift is an offence of this type). Please keep pushing this issue as a matter of principle. The principle of open access needs constant voicing or we'll all end up living in some hellish pay-per-walk Disneyworld mess.

Alastair
mail e-mail: alastairmcgowan@btopenworld.com


Publish your news
-->

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Oxford Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech