HOME | IMC UK | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

Oxford Indymedia

The Bradley Opencast Decision : the 1,600,000 CO2 Question

Steve Leary | 26.09.2014 12:00 | Climate Chaos | Energy Crisis | Social Struggles | London | Oxford

After the recent marches against Climate Change comes the start of a Public Inquiry into whether UK Coal should be allowed to dig up 500,000+ tonnes of coal which will be burnt to produce c 1,600,000 tonnes of CO2. This press release explains why the Inspector should take account of this when judging whether to grant the Appeal.

THE LOOSE ANTI OPENCAST NETWORK

LAON PR 5-2014 26/9/14

THE BRADLEY PUBLIC INQUIRY: THE 1,600,000 TONNE CARBON DIOXIDE QUESTION

On October 7th, the latest stage in the long running battle over whether UK Coal should or should not be allowed to dig out over 500,000 tonnes of coal on the Bradley site near Leadgate in Co Durham starts. This will be the second Public Inquiry appealing against a decision made by Durham County Council to refuse planning permission.

This is a very topical issue. In the week following worldwide marches, where ordinary people expressed their concern about the threat of climate change and urged Governments across the world to take action to prevent climate change, the Loose Anti Opencast Network (LAON) has published their objections to Bradley opencast mine proposals, one of which highlights how giving approval for this mine to go ahead will increase the risk of climate change.

LAON argues that planning policy lays down a general concern to prevent climate change when any decision making body considers granting planning approvals. The fact that mining this coal and then using it in coal fired power stations to create over 1,600,000 tonnes of Carbon Dioxide and contribute to global warming, should be a negative factor when assessing the merits of the appeal. LAON argues

“ ...Under such circumstance, our responsibility is to ensure that this coal is not used in such a way that contributes to global warming and set an example to other countries to do the same. Those countries must take their own blame, if they then allow the same amount of coal to be mined and burnt in our power stations. We will have stopped this additional CO2 from being released into the atmosphere.”

Global warming also has another effect LAON points out. In England we are currently spending nearly £800m annually on climate mitigation measures to prevent flooding caused by the expected rise in temperature levels:

“.. It is therefore ironic,” LAON says in its objection, “....that Durham County Council will have the responsibility of regulating this site if the Appeal is upheld. Ironic because at the same time Durham County Council, a costal county which could experience another tidal surge, like all UK local authorities, is employing staff at public expense, to ensure that the consequences of burning coal in this way and releasing millions of tonnes of CO2, is minimised through measures to mitigate the effects of climate change caused by increased levels of CO2 in the atmosphere. A true assessment of the economic benefit of this proposal should include an assessment of the part of the costs borne by National and Local Governments in the UK, in trying to counter act the consequences of climate change caused by burning coal in an unabated way....”

A full copy of LAON’s objections and a summary of LAON’s objections can be downloaded from this page on the Pont Valley Network site @  http://www.pontvalleynet.co.uk/

LAON will be asking the Inspector at the Public Inquiry to take account of this evidence that the exploitation of this coal reserve will contribute to climate change. This in turn will trigger public expenditure costs to mitigate the effects that climate change has on local populations and this should be considered as a negative point when making a judgement on the Appeal.

Steve Leary, who has written the objections and will an expert witness for the Pont Valley Network said

“The Pont Valley Network was a founder member of LAON and therefore it’s a privilege to be asked to speak on behalf of the local residents, who have been for so long opposing this application. By working together we believe we have used the new National Planning Policy Framework to developed new ways by which to oppose surface mine applications. It will, of course, be up to the Inspector to decide if our objections carry any weight.”

END END END END END

NOTE FOR THE EDITOR

This is the first of a number of press releases LAON will be issuing in the lead up to the Public Inquiry which will explain different parts of LAON’s set of objections.

INFORMATION ABOUT THE PONT VALLEY NETWORK

The Pont Valley Network is group of diverse individuals with varied experiences and backgrounds. We understand that as people we don’t always communicate with each other that well. We might disagree or agree with each other for many reasons but we share one thing in common:

We all live or have lived and care for Pont Burn Valley. We recognise its unique heritage and natural beauty and are prepared to work hard to preserve it.

This is a link to their website @  http://www.pontvalleynet.co.uk/

The contact person for the Pont Valley Network is David Marrs @  david.marrs@rocketmail.com

INFORMATION ABOUT THE LOOSE ANTI OPENCAST NETWORK

The Loose Anti-Opencast Network (LAON) has been in existence since 2009. It is a UK and Northern Ireland wide network of 30 local community groups opposed to local opencast mine proposals / operations. It functions as a medium through which to oppose open cast mine applications and works with groups where local people feel that such a development is inappropriate.

CONTACTING LAON

Steve Leary, LAON’s Spokesperson, at  infoatlaon@yahoo.com


You can now follow LAON on twitter @  http://twitter.com/seftonchase

GROUPS IN THE NETWORK

Coal Action Network Whittonstall Action Group, Northumberland, North Pennine Protection Group, Northumberland, Pont Valley Network, Co Durham, Pittington Residents Group Co Durham, Newton Lane Action Group, Leeds, Residents Against Birklands, GatEshead Cowley Residents Group, Sheffield , Skelmansthorpe Action Group, Kirklees Shortwood Farm Opencast Opposition, Nottinghamshire, West Hallum Environment Group, Derbyshire, Smalley Action Group, Derbyshire, Hilltop Action Group, Derbyshire, , Minorca Opencast Protest Group, Leicestershire, Campaign Against Great Oak Opencast, Staffordshire, Stop Opencast at Sharlston, Wakefield and Alumwell Action Group. Walsall Just Say No to Lignite, N Ireland, Coal Action Scotland Mining and Environment Group, East Ayrshire Saline Parish Hub, Fife Stop Cauldhall Opencast, Midlothian Green Valleys Alliance, Rhymney Valley Residents Against Ffos-y-Fran, Merthyr Tydfil Merthyr Tydfil Anti Opencast Campaign, Merthyr Tydfil Llwdgoed Action, Merthyr Tydfil Varteg Protest, Torfaen United Valleys Action Group, Rhymney Valley and Wales Against Opencast Group.

Steve Leary
- e-mail: infoatlaon@yahoo.com

Download this article in pdf format >>

Email this article to someone >>

Submit an addition or make a quick comment on this article >>

Publish your news

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Oxford Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech